Security for Smart Living

Sana Boujnah, University de Tunis El Manar, and colleagues propose that the ubiquity of smartphones combined with the developing trend toward smart living will make biometrics an important element to incorporate into homes of the future. In addition to being a characteristic unique to an individual, a biometric should be universal and permanent, and the ear meets those criteria. Previous research has shown that even identical twins have differences in their ears, and ear structure is more or less permanent, showing few changes throughout a lifetime.

By proposing to incorporate the earprint biometric into a smartphone app, the authors hope to overcome barriers such as prohibitive cost and complex installation. They envision their system as affordable, scalable to new devices, and familiar to most users.

“The smart home has various benefits, such as providing increased comfort, safety, security and rational use of resources like energy, which contributes to significant savings,” the authors said. “Since the earprint is an encouraging physical trait that has been recently promoted as a biometric asset, we propose it as an alternative to other popular biometrics thanks to its uniqueness and stability.”

Earprint Advantages

People instinctively recognize each other through body traits such as gait and voice. Extracting and measuring such characteristics as a biometric signature is difficult using computer vision methods. In recent years, biometric methods have been integrated into mobile devices to offer security advantages over traditional practices. However, such conventional authentication systems use alphanumeric codes and click-based graphics or patterns that can be hard to remember or easily hacked.

The authors believe the ear to be preferable to other biometrics because it is a “passive biometric.” Unlike facial recognition techniques, its effectiveness is not compromised by facial hair and expressions of emotion. Also, the ear’s color distribution is more even than in an iris or a retina. “The ear is smaller than the face, which means that it is possible to work more efficiently and faster with lower resolution images,” the authors said. They also acknowledge that hair covering the ear can be a problem.

Encouraging Results

The earliest research on ear identification was conducted in 1890. Later refinements divided the ear into seven distinctive features: helix, concha, antihelix, crux of helix, intertragic notch, tragus and antitragus. The authors’ approach combines frequency domain and the local features. Through a series of estimations and extractions, ear features are fused into an identifying feature. The authors evaluated the research using two image databases and support vector machine, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest classifiers. They recorded best accuracies of 93.88% and 92.5%, respectively, with the KNN classifier.

The performance of previously existing ear recognition methods does not hold up under varying lighting contrast, changing viewpoint, and inadequate image registration. The results of this research show a significant performance improvement over current techniques. The authors report that they are encouraged by the speed and robustness of their proposed method, which could be the key to building a real-world ear biometric system.